Prediction of Stacy Margolin vs Corinne Vanier Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Margolin vs C. Vanier

Stacy Margolin

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

168

Best Rank

199

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Corinne Vanier

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

168

Best Rank

199

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Margolin 1 - 0 Vanier

They have played 2 sets in total, with Stacy Margolin winning 2 and Corinne Vanier winning 0. The last match between Stacy Margolin and Corinne Vanier was at the Mahwah, 24-08-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Stacy Margolin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Margolin	1
Vanier	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Mahwah(08-24-81)

Stats

Stacy Margolin

Corinne Vanier

S. Margolin vs C. Vanier H2H Profile

S. Margolin	Stats	C. Vanier
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.50% (119-161)	Career Total W/L	45.42% (134-161)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Margolin vs C. Vanier Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stacy Margolin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Corinne Vanier has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stacy Margolin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Corinne Vanier has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Stacy Margolin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Corinne Vanier has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Stacy Margolin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Corinne Vanier winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Stacy Margolin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 54/60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 13% (W/L 2/13). Corinne Vanier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 33/37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 14/21).
Player level: In the last year, Stacy Margolin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Corinne Vanier has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stacy Margolin winning 1 times and Corinne Vanier being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stacy Margolin winning 2 and Corinne Vanier winning 0.
The last match between Stacy Margolin and Corinne Vanier was at the Mahwah, 24-08-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Stacy Margolin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stacy Margolin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Corinne Vanier has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stacy Margolin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Corinne Vanier has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Stacy Margolin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Corinne Vanier has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Stacy Margolin vs Corinne Vanier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Margolin vs C. Vanier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Margolin	Stats	C. Vanier
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Margolin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Tarzana - 26-01-1987
Q2 Cinda GurneyC. Gurney	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q1 Themis ZambrzyckiT. Zambrzycki	W	6-3 2-6 7-5	Stats
Los Angeles - 11-08-1986
Q1 Maria LindstromM. Lindstrom	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Berkeley - 21-07-1986
Q2 Sherri NorrisS. Norris	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Phoenix - 24-03-1986
Q1 Karen HuebnerK. Huebner	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Vanier Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Paris - 28-09-1987
Q1 Jamie GolderJ. Golder	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q2 Hellas Ter RietH. Ter	L	7-6 6-7 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 25-05-1987
Q1 Marianne Van Der TorreM. Van	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
ITF Bayonne - 19-01-1987
R3 Nathalie HoussetN. Housset	L	6-1 2-6 6-4	Stats
Zurich - 06-10-1986
Q3 Jana NovotnaJ. Novotna	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

S. Margolin vs C. Vanier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Margolin	Stats	C. Vanier
42.50% (119/161)	YTD Win/Loss	45.42% (134/161)
43.80% (279/358)	Sets Win/Loss	45.87% (311/367)
47.87% (2771/3017)	Games Win/Loss	47.60% (3017/3321)
47.37% (54/60)	Hard Win/Loss	47.14% (33/37)
13.33% (2/13)	Clay Win/Loss	44.29% (31/39)
43.75% (35/45)	Indoor Hard W/L	47.46% (28/31)
33.33% (8/16)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (14/21)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
204.4	Average Opponent Rank	276.8
66.67% (2/1)	Slam W/L	33.33% (1/2)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	44.44% (4/5)
55.00% (11/9)	Challenger W/L	56.52% (26/20)
38.89% (14/22)	Futures W/L	38.89% (14/22)
42% (117/276)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	45% (133/293)
0% (0/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	33% (1/3)
45% (35/78)	Deciding Set Win %	51% (47/92)
80% (129/103)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (134/109)
20% (129/26)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (134/25)
10% (150/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (159/24)